Mate Delic vs Nerman Fatic Head to Head Stats
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Delic vs N. Fatic

Mate Delic
CRO
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
32
Age
31
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
225
150
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$27.7K
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
32
Age
31
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
225
150
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$27.7K
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Delic 2 - 1 Fatic
They have played 6 sets in total, with Mate Delic winning 4 and Nerman Fatic winning 2. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Mate Delic was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1 (Doboj), 18-05-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Delic | 2 |
| Fatic | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) Bosnia & Herzegovina F1 (Doboj)(05-18-18)
Nerman Fatic
6
6
Mate Delic
2
3
(R1) Bosnia & Herzegovina F3(05-25-16)
Mate Delic
7
7
Nerman Fatic
6
6
(R1) Bosnia & Herzegovina F4(06-17-13)
Mate Delic
6
6
Nerman Fatic
1
2
M. Delic vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
M. Delic vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mate Delic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mate Delic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mate Delic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mate Delic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nerman Fatic winning 72.31% (W/L 47/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mate Delic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 70/42), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mate Delic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Mate Delic winning 2 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Mate Delic winning 4 and Nerman Fatic winning 2.
- The last match between Mate Delic and Nerman Fatic was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1 (Doboj), 18-05-2018, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:40.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mate Delic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 323.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mate Delic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mate Delic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mate Delic vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Delic vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 0:55:40 | Average Match Time | 0:55:40 |
| 62% (90/146) | 1st Serve % | 71% (100/141) |
| 61% (55/90) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (64/100) |
| 48% (27/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (17/41) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (9/18) |
| 43% (60/141) | Return Points Win % | 44% (64/146) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Delic --%, Fatic 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Delic --%, Fatic 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Delic --%, Fatic 61%.
M. Delic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

M. Delic vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.42% (267/190) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 56.82% (596/453) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 53.14% (5192/4578) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 62.50% (70/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 59.43% (189/129) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 30.77% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1550 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 576 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 631.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.47 |
| 63% (12976/20722) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 70% (9073/12976) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 51% (3924/7746) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 43% (904/2100) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 40% (8318/20707) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 52.73% (58/52) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 62.62% (196/117) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 59% (262/447) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (70/126) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 53% (69/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 87% (261/227) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 12% (261/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 20% (196/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Soha Sadiq
Madhurima Sawant
Anjali Rathi
Laxmisiri Dandu
Maria Mikhailova
Anna Sedysheva
Emma Van Poppel
Bela Tamhankar
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
Jennifer LuikhamSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
07:30
H2H 0-0
07:30
H2H 0-0
08:30
H2H 0-0
08:30
H2H 0-0
07:30
H2H 0-0